In re: Marvin Noble
| In re: MARVIN D. NOBLE |
| CHRIS KING, Acting Warden |
| 22-1489 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Marvin D. Noble. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 06/02/2022. A response or letter indicating no response will be filed is due from the respondent by 06/17/2022. (CAM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Marvin Noble | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: MARVIN D. NOBLE | |
| Represented By: | Marvin D. Noble |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CHRIS KING, Acting Warden | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
