Charles Cahill v. Randee Rewerts
CHARLES CAHILL |
RANDEE REWERTS |
22-1525 |
June 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Randee Rewerts by Andrea Christensen-Brown. Certificate of Service: 06/16/2022. [22-1525] (AMC) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:19 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Virginia Padgett (VLP) [Entered: 06/15/2022 11:38 AM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Cahill. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 06/15/2022 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Charles Cahill v. Randee Rewerts | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: CHARLES CAHILL | |
Represented By: | Charles Cahill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: RANDEE REWERTS | |
Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
Represented By: | Daniel John Ping |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.