Shawna Karnes, et al v. Tiffiny Montengo, et al
SHAWNA KARNES and JEFF GLASER |
TIFFINY MONTENGO and CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES |
22-1615 |
July 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Financial Affidavit filed by Mr. Jeff Glaser and Ms. Shawna Karnes Certificate of Service: 08/15/2022. (ASM) [Entered: 08/22/2022 04:43 PM] |
Filing 10 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Jeff Glaser and Ms. Shawna Karnes to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 08/15/2022. (ASM) [Entered: 08/22/2022 04:40 PM] |
Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 09/19/2022, appellee brief due 10/20/2022. (ASM) [Entered: 08/05/2022 08:26 AM] |
Filing 8 Update fee status change to paid. (ASM) [Entered: 08/03/2022 01:48 PM] |
Filing 7 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Jeff Glaser and Ms. Shawna Karnes for appointment of counsel. Certificate of service: 07/11/2022. (ASM) [Entered: 07/15/2022 01:10 PM] |
Filing 5 LETTER SENT to Mr. Jeff Glaser and Ms. Shawna Karnes, regarding amended case caption (ASM) [Entered: 07/15/2022 12:38 PM] |
Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (ASM) [Entered: 07/15/2022 09:26 AM] |
Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed 7/14/2022, RE #13 denying in forma pauperis. (ASM) [Entered: 07/15/2022 09:24 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:10 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Shawna Karnes. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.