Duncan Alexander v. Mike Brown
| DUNCAN LORENZO ALEXANDER |
| MIKE BROWN, Warden |
| 22-1871 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Virginia Padgett (VLP) [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Duncan Lorenzo Alexander. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Duncan Alexander v. Mike Brown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DUNCAN LORENZO ALEXANDER | |
| Represented By: | Duncan Lorenzo Alexander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: MIKE BROWN, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John S. Pallas |
| Represented By: | Scott Robert Shimkus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
