Michael Gresham v. Pamela Austin, et al
MICHAEL ISHMAEL GRESHAM |
PAMELA AUSTIN, DDS Dentist, UNKNOWN LESE, Correctional Officer, S. EAGLE, named as Unknown S. Eagle or Jane Doe Dental Assistant, UNKNOWN SMITH, Correctional Officer, GLENN CARON, Grievance Coordinator, KEN NEIMISTO, RUM, ROBERT NAPEL, JAMES ALEXANDER, Deputy Warden and KEVIN ROURKE |
22-2063 |
November 23, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (RLB) [Entered: 12/15/2022 12:54 PM] |
Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Michael Ishmael Gresham. Dated: 12/09/2022. (RLB) [Entered: 12/15/2022 12:53 PM] |
Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Michael Ishmael Gresham to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated: 12/09/2022. (RLB) [Entered: 12/15/2022 12:52 PM] |
Filing 5 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (ASM) [Entered: 12/12/2022 03:08 PM] |
Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: regarding motion for in forma pauperis and financial affidavit by Mr. Michael Ishmael Gresham. (ASM) [Entered: 12/12/2022 03:03 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees James Alexander, Pamela Austin, Unknown Lese, Robert Napel and Unknown Smith by Sara E. Trudgeon. Certificate of Service: 12/05/2022. [22-2063] (SET) [Entered: 12/05/2022 10:14 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 11/23/2022 02:31 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Ishmael Gresham. Transcript needed: n. (RLB) [Entered: 11/23/2022 02:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.