Travis KahgegabIn re: Travis Kahgegab
| In re: TRAVIS LEE KAHGEGAB |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-2094 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. Travis Lee Kahgegab to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (REO) [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Travis Lee Kahgegab. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 03/14/2022. (REO) [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Travis KahgegabIn re: Travis Kahgegab | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: TRAVIS LEE KAHGEGAB | |
| Represented By: | Travis Lee Kahgegab |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Goetz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
