Dennis Brock v. Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court
| DENNIS R. BROCK |
| HANCOCK COUNTY, OH COMMON PLEAS COURT |
| 22-3197 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion for miscellaneous relief, [ # 17 ]; previously filed by Dennis R. Brock. Response from Attorney Ms. Lindsay M. Upton for Appellee Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court. Certificate of Service: 05/05/2022. [22-3197] (LMU) [Entered: 05/05/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 17 Appellant MOTION filed by Dennis R. Brock to file briefs on mail-box rule allowed inmates and declare federal court 60(b) judgment improvidently issued . Certificate of service: 04/21/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 16 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 05/26/2022;. appellee brief due 06/28/2022;. (JAS) [Entered: 04/13/2022 02:50 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER filed: We GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART defendants motion to dismiss [ # 8 ]. The appeal is DISMISSED to the extent that Brock appeals the December 4, 2020, judgment. Only issues regarding the January 27, 2022, order denying the motions for relief under Rule 60(b) may be argued on appeal; decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judge and Joan L. Larsen, Circuit Judge. (JAS) [Entered: 04/13/2022 02:43 PM]
|
| Filing 14 REPLY filed by Ms. Lindsay M. Upton for Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court regarding Support of It's Motion to Dismiss Certificate of Service: 04/13/2022. [22-3197] (LMU) [Entered: 04/13/2022 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion to dismiss - jurisdiction, [ # 8 ]; previously filed by Ms. Lindsay M. Upton in 22-3197. Response from Party Dennis R. Brock Certificate of Service:04/07/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 04/08/2022 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT filed regarding motion appointment of counsel previously filed by Dennis R. Brock in 22-3197. Certificate of service:03/21/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 03/23/2022 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED. Incorrect relief used.*** Appellant MOTION filed by Dennis R. Brock for appointment of counsel. Certificate of service: 03/21/2022.--[Edited 03/23/2022 by JAS] (JAS) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court by Lisa M. Zaring. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2022. [22-3197] (LMZ) [Entered: 03/22/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court by Lindsay M. Upton. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2022. [22-3197] (LMU) [Entered: 03/22/2022 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Ms. Lindsay M. Upton for Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2022. [22-3197] (LMU) [Entered: 03/22/2022 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED: 1. Document must be filed as non-modifiable pdf. Counsel instructed to print form as pdf and then save so it cannot be edited. Please re-file this saved document. 2. Document must also be electronically filed by the signing attorney.*** APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court by Lisa M. Zaring. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2022. [22-3197]--[Edited 03/22/2022 by JAS] (LMU) [Entered: 03/22/2022 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED: Duplicate form of #5.*** APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court by Lisa M. Zaring. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2022. [22-3197]--[Edited 03/22/2022 by JAS] (LMU) [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED: Editable document. Document must be filed as non-modifiable pdf. Counsel instructed to print form as pdf and then save so it cannot be edited. Please re-file this saved document.*** APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court by Lindsay M. Upton. Certificate of Service: 03/22/2022. [22-3197]--[Edited 03/22/2022 by JAS] (LMU) [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Dennis R. Brock for appointment of counsel. Certificate of service: 02/23/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 03/10/2022 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of the notice of appeal received here on 2/28/22 along with letter to district court to be filed. (JAS) [Entered: 03/10/2022 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jennifer Strobel (JAS) [Entered: 03/09/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Dennis R. Brock. Transcript needed: n. (JAS) [Entered: 03/09/2022 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dennis Brock v. Hancock County, OH Common Pleas Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DENNIS R. BROCK | |
| Represented By: | Dennis R. Brock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: HANCOCK COUNTY, OH COMMON PLEAS COURT | |
| Represented By: | Lindsay M. Upton |
| Represented By: | Lisa M. Zaring |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
