Barry Riddick v. S&P Data Ohio LLC, et al
JOHN DOE, MIQUEL SNYDER, DAVID WALKER and ALEX MOORE |
BARRY RIDDICK |
S&P DATA OHIO LLC, JOY GADBERRY and WILLIAM PIPKINS, SR. |
22-3239 |
March 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Barry Riddick Certificate of Service: 04/22/2022. (ASM) [Entered: 04/25/2022 11:25 AM] |
Filing 8 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Barry Riddick to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 04/22/2022. (ASM) [Entered: 04/25/2022 11:24 AM] |
Filing 7 LETTER SENT to Mr. Barry Riddick regarding returned mail. (ASM) [Entered: 04/19/2022 08:40 AM] |
Filing 6 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (ASM) [Entered: 04/11/2022 10:32 AM] |
Filing 5 Copy of District Court Order filed 4/7/2022 denying in forma pauperis. (ASM) [Entered: 04/11/2022 10:05 AM] |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Christine M. Snyder for Appellees Joy Gadberry, William Pipkins, Sr. and S&P Data Ohio LLC Certificate of Service: 03/30/2022. [22-3239] (CMS) [Entered: 03/30/2022 08:01 AM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees S&P Data Ohio LLC, Joy Gadberry and William Pipkins, Sr. by Christine M. Snyder. Certificate of Service: 03/18/2022. [22-3239] (CMS) [Entered: 03/18/2022 02:47 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:36 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Barry Riddick. Transcript needed: y. (ASM) [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.