L.O.I. Property, L.L.C., et al v. Butler County, OH, et al
MADISON TOWNSHIP, OH and MADISON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES |
L.O.I. PROPERTY, L.L.C., BRETT OAKLEY and B.A.O. PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C. |
BUTLER COUNTY, OH, BUTLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and PETER ACUFF |
22-3512 |
June 7, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Civil Rights: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
L.O.I. Property v. Butler Cnty., Ohio |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 09/02/2022. appellee brief now due 10/03/2022. (LMR) [Entered: 07/19/2022 10:55 AM] |
Filing 14 VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Follow-up Mediation conference has been scheduled for 08/16/2022 at 2:00 PM (ET) with Scott Coburn. [Please open notice for important details.] (LMR) [Entered: 07/19/2022 10:54 AM] |
Filing 13 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 08/01/2022; appellee brief due 08/31/2022. (LTK) [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:43 AM] |
Filing 12 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Butler County Board of Commissioners and Peter Acuff by Ryan C. Spitzer. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512] (RS) [Entered: 06/21/2022 05:47 PM] |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Molly R Gwin for Appellees Peter Acuff, Butler County Board of Commissioners and Butler County, OH Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512] (MRG) [Entered: 06/21/2022 05:41 PM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Butler County Board of Commissioners and Peter Acuff by Molly R. Gwin. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512] (MRG) [Entered: 06/21/2022 05:39 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants L.O.I. Property, L.L.C., Brett Oakley and B.A.O. Productions, L.L.C. by Charles Galvin. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512] (CBG) [Entered: 06/21/2022 05:30 PM] |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Scott D. Phillips for Appellant Brett Oakley Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512]--[Edited 06/22/2022 by LTK] (SDP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 04:38 PM] |
Filing 7 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Scott D. Phillips for Appellants B.A.O. Productions, L.L.C., L.O.I. Property, L.L.C. and Brett Oakley.. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512] (SDP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:58 PM] |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Scott D. Phillips for Appellant L.O.I. Property, L.L.C. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512]--[Edited 06/21/2022 by LTK] (SDP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:53 PM] |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Scott D. Phillips for Appellant B.A.O. Productions, L.L.C. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512]--[Edited 06/21/2022 by LTK] (SDP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:51 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants L.O.I. Property, L.L.C., Brett Oakley and B.A.O. Productions, L.L.C. by Scott Phillips. Certificate of Service: 06/21/2022. [22-3512] (SDP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:20 PM] |
Filing 3 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 07/18/2022 at 2:00 PM (ET) with Scott Coburn. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 06/08/2022 01:03 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Leon Korotko. (LTK) [Entered: 06/07/2022 03:19 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants B.A.O. Productions, L.L.C., L.O.I. Property, L.L.C. and Brett Oakley. Transcript needed: n. (LTK) [Entered: 06/07/2022 03:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.