Marvin Johnson v. David Bobby
| MARVIN G. JOHNSON |
| DAVID BOBBY, Warden |
| 22-3544 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Patricia Elder (PJE) [Entered: 06/21/2022 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 Death Penalty Case Docketed with certificate of appealability granted in part and denied in part. Notice filed by Appellant Marvin G. Johnson. Transcript needed: n. (PJE) [Entered: 06/21/2022 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marvin Johnson v. David Bobby | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MARVIN G. JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Kort W. Gatterdam |
| Represented By: | John Patrick Parker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DAVID BOBBY, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Seth P. Kestner |
| Represented By: | Charles L. Wille |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
