Timothy Heinz v. Eradal, Inc., et al
| TIMOTHY J. HEINZ |
| ERADAL, INC. and PETER C. KRATCOSKI |
| 22-3615 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Real Property: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Timothy J. Heinz Certificate of Service:09/13/2022. Argument Request: not received. (JAS) [Entered: 09/13/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 09/14/2022;. (JAS) [Entered: 08/02/2022 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 6 Copy of District Court Order filed on 8/1/22 granting extension of time to file appeal and his notice is deemed timely at # 14. (JAS) [Entered: 08/02/2022 09:47 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed : This case is REMANDED to the district court for consideration of whether Heinzs time for filing a notice of appeal should be extended. While on limited remand, Heinzs appeal is held in abeyance. Upon ruling, the district court shall return the case to this court for further proceedings as may be appropriate.. Stephanie Dawkins Davis, Circuit Judge. (JAS) [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:51 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Copy of notice of appeal from district court filed. (JAS) [Entered: 07/26/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. Timothy J. Heinz, regarding ifp needs to be filed in Sixth Circuit. (JAS) [Entered: 07/20/2022 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jennifer Strobel (JAS) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy J. Heinz. Transcript needed: n. (JAS) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
