David Esrati v. DOJ, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID ESRATI
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Southern District of Ohio and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Case Number: 22-3679
Filed: August 11, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Filing 12 Appellant MOTION filed by David Esrati to file supplemental brief. (JAC) [Entered: 09/06/2022 12:45 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 11 LETTER SENT to David Esrati, regarding tendered supplemental brief. (JAC) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:53 AM]
August 29, 2022 Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF filed by Party David Esrati. (JAC) [Entered: 09/06/2022 12:46 PM]
August 29, 2022 Filing 10 TENDERED Supplemental brief. Received from Party David Esrati. (JAC) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:45 AM]
August 22, 2022 Filing 9 Financial Affidavit filed by Party David Esrati Certificate of Service: 08/18/2022. (JAC) [Entered: 08/22/2022 04:57 PM]
August 22, 2022 Filing 8 Appellant MOTION filed by David Esrati to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 08/18/2022. (JAC) [Entered: 08/22/2022 04:56 PM]
August 22, 2022 Filing 7 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (JAC) [Entered: 08/22/2022 03:09 PM]
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 District Court Order (RE #36) filed August 19, 2022 denying in forma pauperis: ORDER denying Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. NOTATION ORDER denying Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 8/19/2022. (JAC) [Entered: 08/22/2022 11:07 AM]
August 14, 2022 Filing 5 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by David Esrati Certificate of Service:08/15/2022. Argument Request: not received. (JAC) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:54 AM]
August 14, 2022 Filing 4 Copy of Notice of Appeal. (JAC) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:53 AM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees DOJ and FBI by Matthew J. Horwitz. Certificate of Service: 08/12/2022. [22-3679] (MJH) [Entered: 08/12/2022 11:32 AM]
August 11, 2022 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Julie Connor (JAC) [Entered: 08/11/2022 09:26 AM]
August 11, 2022 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant David Esrati. Transcript needed: n. (JAC) [Entered: 08/11/2022 09:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Esrati v. DOJ, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID ESRATI
Represented By: David Esrati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Southern District of Ohio
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Horwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Horwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?