Alexander SittenfeldIn re: Alexander Sittenfeld
Petitioner: In re: ALEXANDER SITTENFELD, aka P.G. Sittenfeld
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-3694
Filed: August 15, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 23, 2022 Summary In re: Sittenfeld

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Filing 11 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent USA by Matthew Singer. Certificate of Service: 08/16/2022. [22-3694] (MS) [Entered: 08/16/2022 04:06 PM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 10 LOCKED ** FORM IS IN EDITABLE FORMAT ** PLEASE REFILE BY PRINTING TO PDF AND UPLOADING ** APPEARANCE filed for Respondent USA by Matthew Singer. Certificate of Service: 08/16/2022. [22-3694]--[Edited 08/16/2022 by GSA] (MS) [Entered: 08/16/2022 03:50 PM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION filed by Mr. Matthew Singer for USA to extend time to respond to petition Certificate of Service: 08/16/2022. [22-3694] (MS) [Entered: 08/16/2022 11:42 AM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 8 LETTER SENT to Ms. Emily Noel Glatfelter, Ms. Megan Gaffney Painter, and Mr. Matthew Singer for USA, notifying that party has an opportunity to respond to motion mandamus case. Response due 08/19/2022 by 5:00 PM EST. (GSA) [Entered: 08/16/2022 09:21 AM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 7 Original Proceeding fee paid Mr. Gus John Lazares for Alexander Sittenfeld. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A06-72165-465.. [22-3694] (GJL) [Entered: 08/15/2022 01:10 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: The appearance form, [ # 5 ], filed by Mr. Gus John Lazares for Alexander Sittenfeld is deficient for the reason noted on the attached checklist. Deficiency to be corrected by 08/22/2022. (GSA) [Entered: 08/15/2022 12:42 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Alexander Sittenfeld by Gus J. Lazares. Certificate of Service: 08/15/2022. [22-3694] (GJL) [Entered: 08/15/2022 12:37 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 4 SEALED MANDAMUS filed by Attorney Mr. Gus John Lazares for Petitioner Alexander Sittenfeld. Document: Petition for Writ of Mandamus - sealed with exhibits. Certificate of Service: 08/15/2022. (GSA) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:50 AM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 3 Petitioner MOTION filed by Mr. Gus John Lazares for Alexander Sittenfeld to seal mandamus. Certificate of Service: 08/15/2022. (GSA) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:40 AM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Gretchen Abruzzo (GSA) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:32 AM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Alexander Sittenfeld. Petition Received in 6CA: 08/15/2022. (GSA) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alexander SittenfeldIn re: Alexander Sittenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: ALEXANDER SITTENFELD, aka P.G. Sittenfeld
Represented By: Gus John Lazares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Matthew Singer
Represented By: Emily Noel Glatfelter
Represented By: Megan Gaffney Painter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?