Darryl Taylor v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-5018
Filed: January 7, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 13 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (RGF) [Entered: 02/18/2022 02:39 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 12 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Darryl Anthony Taylor Certificate of Service: 02/12/2022. (RGF) [Entered: 02/18/2022 02:37 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 11 Appellant MOTION filed by Darryl Anthony Taylor to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 02/12/2022. (RGF) [Entered: 02/18/2022 02:35 PM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 10 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee in the District Court or file a IFP motion in this Court on or before March 7, 2022. (RGF) [Entered: 02/01/2022 12:13 PM]
January 20, 2022 Filing 9 Copy of District Court Order filed denying in forma pauperis filed January 21, 2022 . (RGF) [Entered: 01/21/2022 04:09 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Terry M. Cushing. Certificate of Service: 01/18/2022. [22-5018] (TMC) [Entered: 01/18/2022 12:11 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 7 LOCKED -- PLEASE SEE RE #8 *************APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Terry M. Cushing. Certificate of Service: 01/18/2022. [22-5018]--[Edited 01/18/2022 by RGF] (TMC) [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:59 AM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: The appearance form , [ # 5 ], filed by Mr. Terry M. Cushing for USA is deficient for the reason noted on the attached checklist. Deficiency to be corrected by 01/25/2022. (RGF) [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:19 AM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 5 LOCKED - COUNSEL KINDLY ADVISED TO REFILE USING CORRECT CASE NUMBER*************APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Terry M. Cushing. Certificate of Service: 01/18/2022. [22-5018]--[Edited 01/18/2022 by RGF] (JG) [Entered: 01/18/2022 10:44 AM]
January 11, 2022 Filing 4 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Darryl Anthony Taylor show cause for possible jurisdictional defect involving the filing of a late notice of appeal. Response due by 02/01/2022 for Darryl Anthony Taylor. (RGF) [Entered: 01/11/2022 08:32 AM]
January 7, 2022 Filing 3 Deficiency notice filed. (RGF) [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:46 AM]
January 7, 2022 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:45 AM]
January 7, 2022 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied December 7, 2021. Notice filed by Appellant Darryl Anthony Taylor. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Darryl Taylor v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DARRYL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Represented By: Darryl Anthony Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jo E. Lawless
Represented By: Terry M. Cushing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?