USA v. Timothy Batey
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
TIMOTHY JUTODD BATEY |
22-5339 |
April 22, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
United States v. Timothy Jutodd Batey |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTIFICATION: Setting acknowledgement deadline, relating to transcript order, [8]. Mary E. Pierucki's acknowledgement is due 05/11/2022. (RLB) [Entered: 04/27/2022 02:51 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTIFICATION: Setting acknowledgement deadline, relating to transcript order, [7]. Deborah K Watson's acknowledgement is due 05/11/2022. (RLB) [Entered: 04/27/2022 02:50 PM] |
Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ordered from Mary E. Periucki, filed by Mr. Luke Austin Evans for Timothy Jutodd Batey. [8] ; ----- This is to order a transcript of the following proceedings and to certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have been completed ----- Transcript ordered on: 04/26/2022 ; District Court Judge/Magistrate: Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr. ; Hearing Dates: Sentencing Hearing on April 12, 2022 ; Specially authorized proceedings: Setencing Hearing ; Method of Payment: Criminal Justice Act CJA-24 Authorization Date: 04/26/2022 ; ; Court reporter acknowledgement is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 04/26/2022. [22-5339] (LAE) [Entered: 04/26/2022 10:29 AM] |
Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ordered from Ms. Deborah K Watson, filed by Mr. Luke Austin Evans for Timothy Jutodd Batey. [7] ; ----- This is to order a transcript of the following proceedings and to certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have been completed ----- Transcript ordered on: 04/26/2022 ; District Court Judge/Magistrate: Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr. ; Hearing Dates: March 3, 2022. Sentencing Hearing ; Specially authorized proceedings: Sentencing Hearing ; Method of Payment: Criminal Justice Act CJA-24 Authorization Date: 04/26/2022 ; ; Court reporter acknowledgement is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 04/26/2022. [22-5339] (LAE) [Entered: 04/26/2022 10:26 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Timothy Jutodd Batey by Luke Evans. Certificate of Service: 04/26/2022. [22-5339] (LAE) [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:38 AM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Dwight Artis. Certificate of Service: 04/25/2022. [22-5339] (DA) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:02 PM] |
Filing 4 RULING (non-document) to extend appointment of Mr. Luke Austin Evans for Timothy Jutodd Batey as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (RLB) [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:11 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:09 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Timothy Jutodd Batey. Transcript needed: y. (RLB) [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Timothy Batey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Andrew Notaristefano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: TIMOTHY JUTODD BATEY | |
Represented By: | Luke Austin Evans |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.