William Graham v. John Gilley
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM |
JOHN GILLEY, Warden |
22-5423 |
May 13, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER filed to dismiss as a duplicate appeal of case number 22-5412. 6th Cir. R. 45(a)(8). (SSS) [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:23 PM] |
Filing 3 Respondent not served. Petition dismissed in district court without service on respondent. (SSS) [Entered: 05/13/2022 01:24 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 05/13/2022 01:24 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with CAP unnecessary. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. William Charles Graham. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 05/13/2022 01:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Graham v. John Gilley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM | |
Represented By: | William Charles Graham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: JOHN GILLEY, Warden | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.