Alexander KelleyIn re: Alexander Kelley
In re: ALEXANDER PAUL KELLEY |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
22-5512 |
June 16, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. Alexander Paul Kelley to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (SSS) [Entered: 06/16/2022 01:46 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 06/16/2022 01:41 PM] |
Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Alexander Paul Kelley. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 06/13/2022. (Poor quality scan) (SSS) [Entered: 06/16/2022 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Alexander KelleyIn re: Alexander Kelley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: ALEXANDER PAUL KELLEY | |
Represented By: | Alexander Paul Kelley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Debra A. Breneman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.