Rachel Clark v. William Jackson
| RACHEL CLARK |
| WILLIAM L. JACKSON, in his Individual and Official capacity as the CEO of Chattanooga-Hamilton Hospital, dba Erlanger Health System |
| 22-5553 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CORRECTED APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Charles G. Wright, Jr. for Rachel Clark.. Certificate of Service: 08/17/2022. Argument Request: requested. [22-5553] (CGW) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 10 BRIEFING LETTER SENT requesting brief corrections from Mr. Charles G. Wright, Jr. for Rachel Clark because it is missing the record references in the statement of the case as well as the argument sections. The designation of relevant district court documents is also missing. Corrected brief due: 08/22/2022. (JEC) [Entered: 08/15/2022 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED. INCORRECT BRIEF***APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Charles G. Wright, Jr. for Rachel Clark. Certificate of Service: 08/08/2022. Argument Request: requested. [22-5553] --[Edited 08/17/2022 by JEC] (CGW) [Entered: 08/08/2022 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 8 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Charles G. Wright, Jr. for Appellant Rachel Clark.. Certificate of Service: 07/12/2022. [22-5553] (CGW) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Rachel Clark by Charles G. Wright, Jr. Certificate of Service: 07/07/2022. [22-5553] (CGW) [Entered: 07/07/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee William L. Jackson by Arthur P. Brock. Certificate of Service: 07/07/2022. [22-5553] (APB) [Entered: 07/07/2022 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Joseph Alan Jackson, II for Appellee William L. Jackson Certificate of Service: 07/07/2022. [22-5553] (JAJ) [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee William L. Jackson by Joseph Alan Jackson II. Certificate of Service: 07/07/2022. [22-5553] (JAJ) [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 08/08/2022;. appellee brief due 09/07/2022; (JEC) [Entered: 06/29/2022 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jill Colyer (JEC) [Entered: 06/29/2022 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Rachel Clark. Transcript needed: n. (JEC) [Entered: 06/29/2022 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rachel Clark v. William Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RACHEL CLARK | |
| Represented By: | Charles G. Wright Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM L. JACKSON, in his Individual and Official capacity as the CEO of Chattanooga-Hamilton Hospital, dba Erlanger Health System | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Alan Jackson II |
| Represented By: | Arthur P. Brock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.