USA v. William Wooden
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
WILLIAM DALE WOODEN |
22-5686 |
August 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Michael Barrett Menefee for William Dale Wooden as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (JAC) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:37 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Julie Connor (JAC) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:36 AM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellee Cross-Appellant William Dale Wooden. Transcript needed: y. (JAC) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. William Wooden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Luke A. McLaurin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Cross appellant: WILLIAM DALE WOODEN | |
Represented By: | Michael Barrett Menefee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.