Ron Miller v. Alco Management, Inc., et al
RON MILLER |
ALCO MANAGEMENT, INC., ALCO FAIRFAX PARTNERS, LLP, ALCO PROPERTIES, INC., JUDY K. DEVERS, aka Judy K. Clemons, BETH STOLTS, Employee of Alco Management, Inc., CINDY GULLET, Employee of Alco Management, Inc., FRANK Z. JEMISON, CEO of Alco Properties, Inc., ROBERT D. HYDE, President of Alco Management, Inc., LEWIS CRUMP, Georgetown Police Detective, CITY OF GEORGETOWN, KY and ALCO FAIRFAX PARTNERS, LLLP |
22-5825 |
September 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Ron Miller Certificate of Service:10/28/2022. Argument Request: pro se appellant requests oral argument. (JAC) [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:20 PM] |
Filing 6 RECORD RECEIVED. Aty/Pty - CD/DVD, Comment: Audio and video exhibits(Aff and complaint exhibits), Sealed: None. (MH) [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:04 PM] |
Filing 5 Copy of District Court Order (RE #8) filed September 16, 2022 granting in forma pauperis. (JAC) [Entered: 09/16/2022 03:26 PM] |
Filing 4 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 10/28/2022. (JAC) [Entered: 09/15/2022 03:01 PM] |
Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (JAC) [Entered: 09/15/2022 02:58 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Julie Connor (JAC) [Entered: 09/15/2022 02:58 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ron Miller. Transcript needed: n. (JAC) [Entered: 09/15/2022 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.