Daniel Greenberg v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al
| DANIEL S. GREENBERG |
| HERBERT HARRISON SLATERY, III, TN Attorney General, AMBER BARKER, Assistant TN Attorney General, JOSEPH A. WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge, 21st Judicial District, KATHERINE SULLIVAN, Child Support Specialist, Williamson Cty Child Support Services, JENNIFER COLE, MARJORIE KAUP HAINES, CARLA D. GIFFORD and DOES 1-69 |
| 22-5886 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULING LETTER SENT granting first motion to extend time an add'l 30 days to file brief [ # 5 ] filed by Daniel S. Greenberg., resetting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 01/03/2023. (JAS) [Entered: 12/01/2022 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 8 Copy of District Court Order filed regarding request for extension of time to file brief; this motion has already been filed with us. (JAS) [Entered: 12/01/2022 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Daniel S. Greenberg to extend time to file brief. Dated: 11/25/2022. (JAS) [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/30/2022;. (JAS) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (JAS) [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jennifer Strobel (JAS) [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Daniel S. Greenberg. Transcript needed: n. (JAS) [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
