USA v. Gregorio Diaz-Ramos
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
GREGORIO DIAZ-RAMOS |
22-6082 |
December 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Jeffrey Alan Darling for Gregorio Diaz-Ramos as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (JAS) [Entered: 12/15/2022 02:56 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jennifer Strobel (JAS) [Entered: 12/15/2022 02:55 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Gregorio Diaz-Ramos. Transcript needed: y. (JAS) [Entered: 12/15/2022 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Gregorio Diaz-Ramos | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | David A. Marye |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: GREGORIO DIAZ-RAMOS | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Alan Darling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.