Gerald Novak, et al v. William Federspiel
Plaintiff / Appellant: GERALD NOVAK and ADAM WENZEL
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM L. FEDERSPIEL, in his official and personal capacities
Case Number: 23-1024
Filed: January 10, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2023 Filing 10 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Philip Lee Ellison for Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel. Certificate of Service: 01/27/2023. Argument Request: not requested. [23-1024] (PLE) [Entered: 01/27/2023 03:20 PM]
January 26, 2023 Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 03/07/2023;. appellee brief due 04/06/2023; (MRL) [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:54 PM]
January 26, 2023 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Philip Lee Ellison for Appellants Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel Certificate of Service: 01/26/2023. [23-1024] (PLE) [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:25 PM]
January 26, 2023 Filing 7 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Philip Lee Ellison for Appellants Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel.. Certificate of Service: 01/26/2023. [23-1024] (PLE) [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:24 PM]
January 26, 2023 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - no hearings held in District Court. Filed by Mr. Philip Lee Ellison for Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel. Certificate of Service: 01/26/2023. [23-1024] (PLE) [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:24 PM]
January 26, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel by Philip L. Ellison. Certificate of Service: 01/26/2023. [23-1024] (PLE) [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:23 PM]
January 18, 2023 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Douglas J. Curlew for Appellee William L. Federspiel Certificate of Service: 01/18/2023. [23-1024] (DJC) [Entered: 01/18/2023 01:33 PM]
January 17, 2023 Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee William L. Federspiel by Douglas J. Curlew. Certificate of Service: 01/17/2023. [23-1024] (DJC) [Entered: 01/17/2023 11:11 AM]
January 10, 2023 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Michelle R. Lambert (MRL) [Entered: 01/10/2023 12:09 PM]
January 10, 2023 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Gerald Novak and Adam Wenzel. Transcript needed: n. (MRL) [Entered: 01/10/2023 12:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gerald Novak, et al v. William Federspiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: GERALD NOVAK
Represented By: Philip Lee Ellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ADAM WENZEL
Represented By: Philip Lee Ellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM L. FEDERSPIEL, in his official and personal capacities
Represented By: Timothy S. Ferrand
Represented By: Douglas J. Curlew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?