Rossahn Black v. USA
| ROSSAHN BLACK |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-1242 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Leon Korotko. (LTK) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability pending in District Court. Notice filed by Appellant Rossahn Black. Transcript needed: n. (LTK) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rossahn Black v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ROSSAHN BLACK | |
| Represented By: | Rossahn Black |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie M. Gorgon |
| Represented By: | Michael C. Martin |
| Represented By: | Kevin M. Mulcahy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
