NLRB v. McLaren Macomb
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| MCLAREN MACOMB |
| 23-1338 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Proposed Judgment filed by Ms. Ruth E. Burdick for NLRB. Certificate of Service: 04/13/2023. (REO) [Entered: 04/13/2023 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 04/13/2023 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 NLRB Case Docketed, for summary judgment. Notice filed by Petitioner NLRB. Petition Received in 6CA: 03/13/2023. (REO) [Entered: 04/13/2023 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: NLRB v. McLaren Macomb | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | Ruth E. Burdick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MCLAREN MACOMB | |
| Represented By: | Brian D. Shekell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
