Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS |
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, CHRISTINE MCCUMBER-HEMRY, Grievance Coordinator, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager, SCOTT BAILEY, Inspector, ROBIN GILBERT, CFA Deputy Director, V. MCCABE, Assistant Resident Unit Manager, JOHN DOE, CFA Deputy Director and LLOYD RAPELJE, Regional Prison Administrator |
23-1358 |
April 19, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Romero Monte Thomas to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Certificate of service: 06/07/2023. (SSS) [Entered: 06/14/2023 02:11 PM] |
Filing 5 LETTER SENT to Mr. Romero Monte Thomas, in response to letter dated 05/22/2023 including docket sheets for 23-1358 and 23-1304. (SSS) [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:54 AM] |
Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: Letter dated 05/22/2023 regarding ifp, open appeals. etc. by Mr. Romero Monte Thomas. (SSS) [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:41 AM] |
Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. The Court has finished its customary screening to determine jurisdiction. The appellant has 30 days to to either pay the appellate filing fee or file a motion in the district court to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (SSS) [Entered: 05/17/2023 10:51 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Shaday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 04/19/2023 12:19 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Romero Monte Thomas. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 04/19/2023 12:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.