USA v. Amy Shanty
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: AMY LUCILLE SHANTY
Case Number: 23-1747
Filed: August 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2023 Filing 9 NOTIFICATION: Setting acknowledgement deadline, relating to transcript order, [7]. Genevieve Ann Hamlin's acknowledgement is due 09/05/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 08/22/2023 08:09 AM]
August 22, 2023 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION: Setting acknowledgement deadline, relating to transcript order, [6]. Melinda Dexter's acknowledgement is due 09/05/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 08/22/2023 08:08 AM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ordered from Ms. Genevieve Ann Hamlin, filed by Ms. Britt M Cobb for Amy Lucille Shanty. [7] ; ----- This is to order a transcript of the following proceedings and to certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have been completed ----- Transcript ordered on: 08/21/2023 ; District Court Judge/Magistrate: Judge Beckering ; Hearing Dates: Detention hearing (2/7/23); sentencing re Amy Shanty (8/10/23); sentencing re Michael Walworth (6/27/23) ; Method of Payment: Criminal Justice Act ; Court reporter acknowledgement is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 08/21/2023. [23-1747] (BMC) [Entered: 08/21/2023 02:55 PM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ordered from Ms. Melinda Dexter, filed by Ms. Britt M Cobb for Amy Lucille Shanty. [6] ; ----- This is to order a transcript of the following proceedings and to certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have been completed ----- Transcript ordered on: 08/21/2023 ; District Court Judge/Magistrate: Judge Beckering ; Hearing Dates: Plea (4/26/23) ; Method of Payment: Criminal Justice Act ; Court reporter acknowledgement is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 08/21/2023. [23-1747] (BMC) [Entered: 08/21/2023 02:53 PM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Davin M. Reust. Certificate of Service: 08/21/2023. [23-1747] (DMR) [Entered: 08/21/2023 12:19 PM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Amy Lucille Shanty by Britt M. Cobb. Certificate of Service: 08/21/2023. [23-1747] (BMC) [Entered: 08/21/2023 11:33 AM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Ms. Britt M Cobb for Amy Lucille Shanty as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (CAM) [Entered: 08/21/2023 09:20 AM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 08/21/2023 09:19 AM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Amy Lucille Shanty. Transcript needed: y. (CAM) [Entered: 08/21/2023 09:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Amy Shanty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Davin M. Reust
Represented By: Daniel T. McGraw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: AMY LUCILLE SHANTY
Represented By: Britt M. Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?