NLRB v. Intertape Polymer Corp.
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and INTERTAPE POLYMER CORP. |
| 23-1854 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 NLRB Case Docketed Cross-Petition for Review to NLRB's application for enforcement. Notice filed by Respondent Cross-Petitioner Intertape Polymer Corp.. Petition Received in 6CA: 09/18/2023. (RLB) [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: NLRB v. Intertape Polymer Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | Ruth E. Burdick |
| Represented By: | Milakshmi V. Rajapakse |
| Represented By: | David A. Seid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: INTERTAPE POLYMER CORP. | |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Ryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
