George Hamas v. Shiawassee Cnty, MI, et al
| GEORGE HAMAS |
| SHIAWASSEE COUNTY, MI, JUDGE MATTHEW STEWART, DOUGLAS E. CORWIN, SCOTT A. KOERNER, DEANA M. FINNEGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MCNALLY, SHERRIF BRIAN BEGOLE, KEITH M. HANSEN, SEAN GIFFORD, JOHN DOE, 1 to Infinity, WARD L. CLARKSON and MICHAEL L. HERENDEEN |
| 23-1924 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| RICO |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Miscellaneous letter sent REGARDING items requested from Mr. Hamas, (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2023 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. George Hamas Certificate of Service:11/01/2023. Argument Request:PRO SE (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Mr. George Hamas. (RLB) [Entered: 11/02/2023 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 LOCKED - PLEASE SEE #7********SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Mr. George Hamas. (RGF) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 5 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Mr. George Hamas show cause directing that the enclosed notice of appeal be signed and returned to this court by 11/03/2023... (RGF) [Entered: 10/20/2023 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/30/2023;. (RGF) [Entered: 10/18/2023 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Update fee status change to ifp. (RGF) [Entered: 10/18/2023 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 10/18/2023 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. George Hamas. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 10/18/2023 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
