Raynada JonesIn re: Raynada Jones
| In re: RAYNADA JONES |
| JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden |
| 23-1968 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING directing Movant Mr. Raynada Jones to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. Corrected motion due 11/30/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 10/31/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 10/31/2023 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Raynada Jones. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 10/27/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 10/31/2023 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raynada JonesIn re: Raynada Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RAYNADA JONES | |
| Represented By: | Raynada Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
