Nicholas Partridge v. Cuyahoga Cnty Common Pleas Ct, et al
| NICHOLAS DENARD PARTRIDGE |
| CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and JUDGE BRIAN CORRIGAN |
| 23-3041 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed to the show cause for jurisdiction - late noa, [ # 3 ]. Response filed by Party Mr. Nicholas Denard Partridge. Certificate of Service:02/13/2023. (RGF) [Entered: 02/13/2023 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Nicholas Denard Partridge Certificate of Service: 01/27/2023. (RGF) [Entered: 02/07/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Nicholas Denard Partridge to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 01/27/2023. (RGF) [Entered: 02/07/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee in the DISTRICT COURT or file a IFP motion in this Court on or before February 24, 2023. (RGF) [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of Notice of appeal from district court filed. (RGF) [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Mr. Nicholas Denard Partridge show cause for possible jurisdictional defect involving the filing of a late notice of appeal. Response due by 02/14/2023 for Nicholas Denard Partridge. (RGF) [Entered: 01/24/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 01/18/2023 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Nicholas Denard Partridge. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 01/18/2023 08:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
