Kavin Peeples v. David Conley
| KAVIN LEE PEEPLES |
| DAVID C. CONLEY |
| 23-3113 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CORRESPONDENCE: cover letter and envelope by Kavin Lee Peeples. (PJE) [Entered: 03/28/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Kavin Lee Peeples Certificate of Service:03/20/2023. (PJE) [Entered: 03/28/2023 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 13 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (PJE) [Entered: 03/28/2023 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 12 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Kavin Lee Peeples Certificate of Service: 03/04/2023. (PJE) [Entered: 03/28/2023 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 11 Appellant MOTION filed by Kavin Lee Peeples to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 03/04/2023. (PJE) [Entered: 03/28/2023 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 10 Copy of District Court Order filed R.34 3-16-23 denying in forma pauperis. The Court already denied plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis and certified that an appeal of the Order would not be taken in good faith in the January 19, 2023 Order. Plaintiff remains free to seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. (PJE) [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 9 RULING LETTER SENT GRANTING in part appellant's motion extend time to submit IFP forms [ # 8 ] filed by Kavin Lee Peeples. Fee or IFP motion due 5/1/2023. (PJE) [Entered: 03/09/2023 07:31 AM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant MOTION with memorandum in support and appendix filed by Kavin Lee Peeples to extend time of 60 days to file forms. Certificate of service: 02/28/2023. (PJE) [Entered: 03/08/2023 06:48 AM] |
| Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE: reequesting blank IFP forms by Kavin Lee Peeples. (PJE) [Entered: 03/08/2023 06:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 CORRESPONDENCE: requesting that we download and file documents he filed in DC by Kavin Lee Peeples. (PJE) [Entered: 03/08/2023 06:40 AM] |
| Filing 5 RULING LETTER SENT: IFP forms due in 6CA by 3/30/23 or fee in DC.. (PJE) [Entered: 02/28/2023 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: letter advising of e-filing in district court by Kavin Lee Peeples. (PJE) [Entered: 02/28/2023 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 Update fee status change to pending in the district court. R.30 Motion for IFP filed in DC 2-7-23. DC has already certified not in good faith. Awaiting DC ruling. (PJE) [Entered: 02/08/2023 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Patricia Elder (PJE) [Entered: 02/08/2023 07:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Kavin Lee Peeples. Transcript needed: n. (PJE) [Entered: 02/08/2023 07:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kavin Peeples v. David Conley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KAVIN LEE PEEPLES | |
| Represented By: | Kavin Lee Peeples |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAVID C. CONLEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
