In re: Anthony Apanovitch
Petitioner: In re: ANTHONY C. APANOVITCH
Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Case Number: 23-3149
Filed: February 17, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2023 Filing 11 REPLY filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Anthony C. Apanovitch regarding Warden's Memorandum In Opposition To Apanovitch's Motion For Leave To File A Second Or Successive Petition And Motion To Retransfer/ Remand To The District Court Certificate of Service: 03/15/2023. [23-3149] (ACR) [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:17 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 10 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion, [ # 8 ]; previously filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Anthony C. Apanovitch, regarding a motion to remand case, [ # 9 ]; previously filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Anthony C. Apanovitch. Response from Attorney Mr. Charles L. Wille for Respondent Tim Shoop. Certificate of Service: 03/09/2023. [23-3149] (CLW) [Entered: 03/09/2023 11:28 AM]
March 3, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION filed by Bevlynn J. Sledge and Alan C. Rossman for Anthony C. Apanovitch to remand. Certificate of Service: 03/03/2023. [23-3149]--[Edited 03/03/2023 by PJE] (ACR) [Entered: 03/03/2023 03:26 PM]
March 3, 2023 Filing 8 Corrected second successive motion filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Anthony C. Apanovitch. If the respondent chooses to file a response, it is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 03/03/2023. [23-3149] (ACR) [Entered: 03/03/2023 03:18 PM]
February 24, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Tim Shoop by Charles L. Wille. Certificate of Service: 02/24/2023. [23-3149] (CLW) [Entered: 02/24/2023 10:39 AM]
February 24, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Movant Anthony C. Apanovitch by Bevlynn J. Sledge. Certificate of Service: 02/24/2023. [23-3149] (BJS) [Entered: 02/24/2023 09:02 AM]
February 24, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Movant Anthony C. Apanovitch by Alan C. Rossman. Certificate of Service: 02/24/2023. [23-3149] (ACR) [Entered: 02/24/2023 08:51 AM]
February 17, 2023 Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Anthony C. Apanovitch to file a corrected second successive habeas motion by March 3, 2023. (PJE) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:27 PM]
February 17, 2023 Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed 2-17-23 R.11 to transfer proceedings to to the 6th Circuit as a second successive application (PJE) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:23 PM]
February 17, 2023 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Patricia Elder (PJE) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:21 PM]
February 17, 2023 Filing 1 Second Successive Death Penalty Case Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Anthony C. Apanovitch. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 02/17/2023. (PJE) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Anthony Apanovitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: ANTHONY C. APANOVITCH
Represented By: Bevlynn Joann Sledge
Represented By: Alan C. Rossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Represented By: Charles L. Wille
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?