James Hajdin v. OH, et al
| JAMES ROBERT HAJDIN, aka James Robert Hayden |
| STATE OF OHIO and MIKE DEWINE |
| 23-3753 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (ASM) [Entered: 10/24/2023 02:24 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed: We therefore DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction; not for publication. No mandate to issue. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and Andre B. Mathis, Circuit Judge.--[Edited 10/24/2023 by ASM] (ASM) [Entered: 10/24/2023 02:20 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. James Robert Hajdin Certificate of Service: 09/12/2023. (ASM) [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. James Robert Hajdin to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 09/12/2023. (ASM) [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 5 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Mr. James Robert Hajdin. (ASM) [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: cover letter and envelope by Mr. James Robert Hajdin. (ASM) [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. James Robert Hajdin, directing that the enclosed notice of appeal be signed and returned to this court by 09/27/2023. (ASM) [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. James Robert Hajdin. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
