USA v. Jose Rodriguez
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
JOSE RODRIGUEZ |
23-3912 |
November 9, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING [non-document] to extend appointment of Mr. Jon D. Richardson for Jose Rodriguez as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (LTK) [Entered: 11/09/2023 03:19 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Leon Korotko. (LTK) [Entered: 11/09/2023 03:19 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Jose Rodriguez. Transcript needed: y. (LTK) [Entered: 11/09/2023 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Jose Rodriguez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Robert N. Melching |
Represented By: | Alissa Michelle Sterling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JOSE RODRIGUEZ | |
Represented By: | Jon D. Richardson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.