Dante' Stone v. James Green, et al
| DANTE' CORVETTE STONE |
| JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, JAMES WHITT, Deputy Warden, PAUL CROUCH, Deputy Warden, SHAWN MCKENZIE, Warden and AARON HOLBROOK, Unit Administrator II |
| 23-5031 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER filed denying motion to hold case in abeyance or dismiss the appeal without prejudice [ # 6 ] filed by Mr. Dante' Corvette Stone. (MMP) [Entered: 02/13/2023 10:07 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Dante' Corvette Stone to redact names and place under judicial seal sworn and signed eye witness statements. Certificate of service: (MMP) [Entered: 02/09/2023 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Dante' Corvette Stone to hold case in abeyance or dismiss the appeal without prejueice. Certificate of service:--[Edited 02/13/2023 by MMP] (MMP) [Entered: 02/09/2023 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Dante' Corvette Stone regarding secure notice of ex parte. (MMP) [Entered: 02/09/2023 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed: Stones latest motions (Docs. # 11 and 14) are DENIED as moot; (2) This civil action remains DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (MMP) [Entered: 01/27/2023 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Monica Page (MMP) [Entered: 01/12/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Dante' Corvette Stone. Transcript needed: n. (MMP) [Entered: 01/12/2023 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
