Gary Montgomery v. Thomas Conrad, et al
| GARY MONTGOMERY |
| THOMAS CONRAD, Lieutenant with Davidson County Sheriff's Office, LEONARD JOHNSON, Sergeant at Davidson County Sheriff's Office, RICHARD GRANT, Sergeant at Davidson County Sheriff's Office, SHARON BAXTER, Correctional Officer at Davidson County Sheriff's Office, GRANVISSE EARL, Program Director at Davidson County Sheriff's Office, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN, DARON HALL, Davidson County Sheriff, SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, Contractor and VEND ENGINE, Contractor |
| 23-5060 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Update fee status change to pending in the district court. R.30 IFP document filed in DC (PJE) [Entered: 03/14/2023 07:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 LETTER SENT to Mr. Gary Montgomery, returning unfiled application to proceed in forma pauperis. (PJE) [Entered: 02/28/2023 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: cover ltr and envelope with DC application to proceed in forma pauperis by Mr. Gary Montgomery. (PJE) [Entered: 02/28/2023 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Thomas Conrad by Michael R. Dohn. Certificate of Service: 02/16/2023. [23-5060] (MRD) [Entered: 02/16/2023 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Patricia Elder (PJE) [Entered: 01/23/2023 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Gary Montgomery. Transcript needed: n. Fee or forms due in DC by 2/22/23. (PJE) [Entered: 01/23/2023 08:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
