David Frazier v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
| DAVID TRAVIS FRAZIER |
| JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden |
| 23-5164 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion extend time [ # 5 ] to file a response to the show cause order for 30 days filed by David Travis Frazier. The response is now due May 5, 2023. (RLB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by David Travis Frazier to extend time for 30 days to file a response to the show cause order. Certificate of service:. (RLB) [Entered: 04/03/2023 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 4 SHOW CAUSE order filed: It is therefore ordered that Frazier show cause in writing not later than 21 days from the date of this order why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2107(a) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).. Response due by 03/28/2023 for David Travis Frazier. (SSS) [Entered: 03/07/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Jonathan Thomas Skrmetti by Nicholas S. Bolduc. Certificate of Service: 03/03/2023. [23-5164] (NB) [Entered: 03/03/2023 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 02/28/2023 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant David Travis Frazier. Transcript needed: n. (RLB) [Entered: 02/28/2023 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
