Ronald Waddell, Jr. v. City of Greeneville, TN, et al
| RONALD RICHARD WADDELL, JR. |
| CITY OF GREENEVILLE, TN and GREENEVILLE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 23-5197 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (LTK) [Entered: 04/17/2023 10:24 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed to DISMISS case for lack of jurisdiction. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Chief Circuit Judge; Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge and Stephanie Dawkins Davis, Circuit Judge. (LTK) [Entered: 04/17/2023 10:22 AM]
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE filed to the show cause for jurisdiction - late noa, [ # 4 ]. Response filed by Party Mr. Ronald Richard Waddell, Jr. Certificate of Service:03/20/2023. (REO) [Entered: 04/03/2023 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Mr. Ronald Richard Waddell, Jr. show cause for possible jurisdictional defect involving the filing of a late notice of appeal, and to hold briefing in abeyance. Response due by 04/03/2023 for Ronald Richard Waddell Jr. (REO) [Entered: 03/13/2023 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 04/21/2023. (REO) [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Richard Waddell, Jr. Transcript needed: n. (REO) [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
