USA v. Amber Hamm
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: AMBER LEA HAMM
Case Number: 23-5572
Filed: June 20, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2023 Filing 3 RULING [non-document] to extend appointment of Mr. Barry Andrew Glenn for Amber Lea Hamm as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (LTK) [Entered: 06/20/2023 12:45 PM]
June 20, 2023 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Leon Korotko. (LTK) [Entered: 06/20/2023 12:44 PM]
June 20, 2023 Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Amber Lea Hamm. Transcript needed: y. (LTK) [Entered: 06/20/2023 12:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Amber Hamm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: J. Christian Lampe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: AMBER LEA HAMM
Represented By: Barry Andrew Glenn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?