Christopher Wieland v. Rebecca Dodds, et al
| CHRISTOPHER NICHOLAS WIELAND |
| REBECCA DODDS, DEANNE DIXON, MARK B. MIESSE and ROBERT C. WIELAND, III |
| 23-5709 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Appellant MOTION to Disqualify Judges filed by Mr. Christopher Nicholas Wieland. (VLP) [Entered: 09/26/2023 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 8 FILED: Document titled Argument For Diversity Jurisdiction by Mr. Christopher Nicholas Wieland. (VLP) [Entered: 09/14/2023 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees DeAnne Dixon, Rebecca Dodds, Mark B. Miesse and Mr. Robert C. Wieland, III by Taylor A. Cates. Certificate of Service: 09/07/2023. [23-5709] (TAC) [Entered: 09/07/2023 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 4A4 ORDER from district court filed 08/14/2023 RE#33. (VLP) [Entered: 09/05/2023 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Christopher Nicholas Wieland Certificate of Service: 08/31/2023. (VLP) [Entered: 09/05/2023 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Christopher Nicholas Wieland to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 08/31/2023. (VLP) [Entered: 09/05/2023 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 3 4a4 Notice filed. Case held in abeyance (VLP) [Entered: 08/09/2023 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Virginia Padgett (VLP) [Entered: 08/09/2023 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Nicholas Wieland. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 08/09/2023 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
