USA v. Roderick McNeal
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RODERICK MCNEAL, aka Roderick McNeil, aka Rodrick McNeal, aka Roderick Williams |
| 23-5851 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 09/26/2023 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Roderick McNeal. Transcript needed: y. (ASM) [Entered: 09/26/2023 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Roderick McNeal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Raney Irwin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: RODERICK MCNEAL, aka Roderick McNeil, aka Rodrick McNeal, aka Roderick Williams | |
| Represented By: | Claiborne Hambrick Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
