Sanket Patel, et al v. Ur Jaddou
| SANKET HASMUKHBAI PATEL and NEHABEN SANKET PATEL |
| UR JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 23-5867 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other Immigration Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ***LOCKED--COUNSEL IS INSTRUCTED TO REFILE MOTION AND CORRECTED BRIEF SEPARATELY. MOTION SHOULD BE REFILED USING THE SAME DOCKET ENTRY. CORRECTED BRIEF SHOULD BE REFILED USING THE CORRECTED BRIEF DOCKET ENTRY*** MOTION filed by Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 11/27/2023. [23-5867]--[Edited 11/27/2023 by CAM] (BBB) [Entered: 11/27/2023 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEFING LETTER SENT requesting brief corrections from Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel and Nehaben Sanket Patel because citations to the lower court record and the designation of relevant lower court documents must use the page ID# of the consecutively paginated record that is generated in the header when a document is viewed from the docket, not the page numbers of each individual document. Corrected brief due: 11/22/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 11/15/2023 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 ***LOCKED--SEE BRIEFING LETTER [11]*** CORRECTED APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel.. Certificate of Service: 11/14/2023. Argument Request: requested. [23-5867]--[Edited 11/15/2023 by CAM] (BBB) [Entered: 11/14/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT requesting brief corrections from Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel and Nehaben Sanket Patel because citations to the lower court record and the designation of relevant lower court documents should utilize the page ID# range generated in the header and not the individual pagination of each document. Corrected brief due: 11/21/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 11/14/2023 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 8 ***LOCKED--SEE BRIEFING LETTER [9]*** APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel. Certificate of Service: 11/13/2023. Argument Request: requested. [23-5867]--[Edited 11/14/2023 by CAM] (BBB) [Entered: 11/13/2023 10:49 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Ur Jaddou by Fizza Batool. Certificate of Service: 10/16/2023. [23-5867] (FB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Appellants Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel Certificate of Service: 10/16/2023. [23-5867] (BBB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Bradley Bruce Banias for Appellants Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel.. Certificate of Service: 10/16/2023. [23-5867] (BBB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel by Brad Banias. Certificate of Service: 10/16/2023. [23-5867] (BBB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/13/2023; appellee brief due 12/13/2023. (CAM) [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Nehaben Sanket Patel and Sanket Hasmukhbai Patel. Transcript needed: n. (CAM) [Entered: 10/02/2023 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
