Donald LynchIn re: Donald Lynch
| In re: DONALD CHRISTOPHER LYNCH |
| DANIEL AKERS, Warden |
| 23-5906 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Donald Christopher Lynch to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (GSA) [Entered: 10/16/2023 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Gretchen Abruzzo (GSA) [Entered: 10/16/2023 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Donald Christopher Lynch. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 10/13/2023. (GSA) [Entered: 10/16/2023 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Donald LynchIn re: Donald Lynch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DONALD CHRISTOPHER LYNCH | |
| Represented By: | Donald Christopher Lynch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DANIEL AKERS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Todd D. Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
