Akash Dixit v. Fredrick Smith, et al
AKASH DIXIT |
FREDRICK W. SMITH, BABITA TIWARI, TANYA SINGH, KARAN SINGH, GREGORY D. GOLDEN, KUPFERMAN & GOLDEN, GOLDEN FIRM and FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION |
23-5972 |
November 1, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Racketeer Influenced |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULING LETTER SENT granting appellant's emergency motion to extend time to file brief by 45 days [ # 6 ] filed by Mr. Akash Dixit., resetting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/16/2024. appellee brief now due 03/18/2024. (SSS) [Entered: 12/19/2023 10:10 AM] |
Filing 6 Appellant Emergency MOTION filed by Mr. Akash Dixit to extend time to file brief by 45 days. Certificate of service: 12/17/2023. (SSS) [Entered: 12/19/2023 09:28 AM] |
Filing 5 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/02/2024; appellee brief due 02/01/2024. (SSS) [Entered: 11/17/2023 10:18 AM] |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Thomas Whitelaw Murrey, Jr. for Appellees Federal Express Corporation, Fredrick W. Smith and Babita Tiwari Certificate of Service: 11/03/2023. [23-5972] (TWM) [Entered: 11/03/2023 12:09 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Federal Express Corporation, Fredrick W. Smith and Babita Tiwari by Thomas W. Murrey, Jr.. Certificate of Service: 11/03/2023. [23-5972] (TWM) [Entered: 11/03/2023 12:06 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 11/01/2023 12:21 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Akash Dixit. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 11/01/2023 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.