Carl Shupe, et alIn re: Carl Shupe, et al
| In re: CARL SHUPE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CONSTRUCTION LABORERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA |
| ROCK HOLDINGS INC., JAY D. FARNER, ROCKET COMPANIES, INC. and DANIEL GILBERT |
| 24-105 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Respondents Jay D. Farner, Daniel Gilbert and Rock Holdings Inc. by Jeffrey B. Morganroth. Certificate of Service: 10/18/2024. [24-0105] (JBM) [Entered: 10/18/2024 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California by Christine M. Fox. Certificate of Service: 10/18/2024. [24-0105] (CMF) [Entered: 10/18/2024 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Respondents Jay Farner, Daniel Gilbert and Rock Holdings Inc. by Sharon L. Nelles. Certificate of Service: 10/17/2024. [24-0105] (SLN) [Entered: 10/17/2024 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondents Jay Farner, Daniel Gilbert and Rock Holdings Inc. by Julia A. Malkina. Certificate of Service: 10/17/2024. [24-0105] (JAM) [Entered: 10/17/2024 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 10/17/2024 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 Permission for Leave to Appeal Docketed. Request filed by Petitioners Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California and Carl Shupe. Petition Received in 6CA: 10/15/2024. (SSS) [Entered: 10/17/2024 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.