In re: Maurice Woodson
| In re: MAURICE WOODSON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-1065 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Leon Korotko. (LTK) [Entered: 01/26/2024 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Maurice Woodson to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. Corrected second successive habeas motion due 02/26/2024. (LTK) [Entered: 01/26/2024 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Maurice Woodson. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 01/25/2024. (LTK) [Entered: 01/26/2024 01:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Maurice Woodson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: MAURICE WOODSON | |
| Represented By: | Maurice Woodson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Charles P. Wisdom Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
