Glen Sedlacek v. Eric Rardin
| GLEN ARLAN SEDLACEK |
| ERIC RARDIN, Warden |
| 24-1254 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 05/09/2024, appellee brief due 06/11/2024. (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2024 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2024 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with CAP unnecessary. Notice filed by Appellant Glen Arlan Sedlacek. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2024 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Glen Sedlacek v. Eric Rardin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: GLEN ARLAN SEDLACEK | |
| Represented By: | Glen Arlan Sedlacek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ERIC RARDIN, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Erin S. Shaw |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
