Dustin Hawkins v. Noah Nagy
| DUSTIN JAMES HAWKINS |
| JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden and NOAH NAGY, Warden |
| 24-1285 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Dustin James Hawkins by SANFORD A. SCHULMAN. Certificate of Service: 04/24/2024. [24-1285] (SAS) [Entered: 04/24/2024 10:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED - INCORRECT .pdf FORMAT - COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE AS A NON-MODIFIABLE .pdf DOCUMENT*** APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Dustin James Hawkins and Appellee Noah Nagy by SANFORD A. SCHULMAN. Certificate of Service: 04/23/2024. [24-1285]--[Edited 04/24/2024 by RLB] (SAS) [Entered: 04/23/2024 08:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Noah Nagy by John Pallas. Certificate of Service: 04/12/2024. [24-1285] (JSP) [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. Sanford A. Schulman for Dustin James Hawkins and Ms. Andrea M. Christensen-Brown for Noah Nagy enclosing a corrected case caption. Upon review, it appears that defendant has been relocated to Parnall Correctional Facility and Noah Nagy is the Warden for that facility. The amended caption is to be used for all future case filings. (RLB) [Entered: 04/04/2024 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 04/03/2024 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Dustin James Hawkins. Transcript needed: n. (RLB) [Entered: 04/03/2024 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
