Roy Sutton, III v. Scott Wriggelsworth, et al
| ROY EUGENE SUTTON, III |
| SCOTT WRIGGELSWORTH, Sheriff, in official and personal capacity, GLEN CIPULLO, Medical Doctor/Provider, in official and personal capacity and JOHN DOE, Health Care Worker, in official and personal capacity |
| 24-1483 |
| June 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 7 ] filed by Mr. Roy Eugene Sutton, III. 30 day extension of time granted. Resetting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 08/30/2024. (REO) [Entered: 07/02/2024 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Roy Eugene Sutton, III to extend time to file brief. Includes address update. Certificate of service: 06/27/2024. (REO) [Entered: 07/02/2024 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 07/31/2024. (GSA) [Entered: 06/18/2024 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis. (GSA) [Entered: 06/18/2024 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. Fee or motion for pauper status due in district court by July 5, 2024. (GSA) [Entered: 06/04/2024 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Gretchen Abruzzo (GSA) [Entered: 06/04/2024 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Roy Eugene Sutton, III. Transcript needed: n. (GSA) [Entered: 06/04/2024 08:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
